<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does standard work apply to CEOs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timebackmanagement.com/blog/does-standard-work-apply-to-ceos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timebackmanagement.com/blog/does-standard-work-apply-to-ceos/</link>
	<description>Working At The Intersection of Personal Productivity and Lean Manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://timebackmanagement.com/blog/does-standard-work-apply-to-ceos/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Dan, I think this is right on. The CEO version of this problem is not much different, at bottom, than the one the rest of us face: *forcing* time into the schedule for what&#039;s *most* important . . . and doing it at the outright expense of what&#039;s least important.

If hospital visits are important for the Novartis CEO, those should be sacrosanct -- just like dedicated, uninterrupted time for research and writing should be sacrosanct for a college professor. And if these important activities are losing ground to e-mail overload or incessant meetings or what-have-you, the solution isn&#039;t to throw up one&#039;s hands, or to give up on the more important activities, but to TAKE CONTROL of the calendar -- just as you say.

Steven Covey had the right idea in &quot;First Things First&quot;: *block out* the time in your calendar for what&#039;s most important, even if (or maybe especially if) there&#039;s less urgency attached to those tasks. Otherwise, the noisy but less-important urgencies of the week will crowd out the deep work that really gets us somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I think this is right on. The CEO version of this problem is not much different, at bottom, than the one the rest of us face: *forcing* time into the schedule for what&#8217;s *most* important . . . and doing it at the outright expense of what&#8217;s least important.</p>
<p>If hospital visits are important for the Novartis CEO, those should be sacrosanct &#8212; just like dedicated, uninterrupted time for research and writing should be sacrosanct for a college professor. And if these important activities are losing ground to e-mail overload or incessant meetings or what-have-you, the solution isn&#8217;t to throw up one&#8217;s hands, or to give up on the more important activities, but to TAKE CONTROL of the calendar &#8212; just as you say.</p>
<p>Steven Covey had the right idea in &#8220;First Things First&#8221;: *block out* the time in your calendar for what&#8217;s most important, even if (or maybe especially if) there&#8217;s less urgency attached to those tasks. Otherwise, the noisy but less-important urgencies of the week will crowd out the deep work that really gets us somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

